Skip to main content

Why is my robot not perfect? (part 2)

So here is the follow up to the post I made last week. Click here to refresh your memory.

There were a few different points of view with the theory so what better way to proceed than some real live tests.

Test Setup:
NXT robot, 2 wheels on a smoothish table.
2 white lines, 500mm apart
Program was written to wait 2 seconds then drive forward 1024 degrees. (the 2 seconds allowed the robot to settle and let me get my hand out of the way before it started driving)



1st test
75% power 1024 degrees, unloaded. I ran this 3 times and it was spot on in every case.

2nd test
50% power 1024 degrees, unloaded. I wanted to try and eliminate slippage with the surface of the table. If there was slippage at high power, it would be less at low power. Again all 3 runs were spot on.

3rd test
75% power 1023 degrees fully loaded. I found a nice heavy book to place over the top (2.2kg). The wheel does deform by a noticeable amount.


This time when I ran it, the robot came consistantly 30mm short. Vary the power and get the same result, 30mm short.

So if there is no slippage with the table, and changing of the wheel diameter does not affect the distance the only thing left is slippage between the wheel and the tyre.

I got some whiteout and marked both the hub and the tire and ran the experiment again. Turns out there is a small amount of slippage, although not enough to account for all the error.



Conclusion:
I think it's a combination of hub/tyre slippage and slightly deformed wheel diameter. The rubber is soft enough to compress itself slightly changing the diameter.

What do you think? Post in the comments.

--
Damien Kee

Popular posts from this blog

MINDSTORMS Retires!

2023 is the 25th Anniversary of the MINDSTORMS brand. For 25 years, MINDSTORMS has educated and inspired a generation of robot builders, both children and adults. Unfortunately, the LEGO Group decided to end the line on December 2022. Many ROBOTMAK3RS have been passionately involved with the development of MINDSTORMS through the MUP and MCP programs. Even with the newest Robot Inventor line, several ROBOTMAK3RS were invited to submit additional bonus models that were included in the official app. Regardless of the retirement of a major LEGO robotics product line, ROBOTMAK3RS continue to MAKE-SHARE-INSPIRE using all LEGO robotics platforms available to us. Here is the official statement from LEGO. Since its launch in September 1998, LEGO MINDSTORMS has been one of the core ‘Build & Code’ experiences in the company’s portfolio, carrying with it significant brand equity and becoming a stand-out experience for the early days of consumer robotics and leading to current Build & Code

Celebrating 25 Years of MINDSTORMS

In celebration of the 25th Anniversary of MINDSTORMS, we take a trip through history. Please also visit ROBOTMAK3RS Community every week as we highlight different projects all through 2023 in celebration of the anniversary. Some of the early history is based on the content shared by  Coder Shah  in our  MINDSTORMS EV3 Community Group . Some of the text and links may have been edited from his original posts for consistency and clarity.  1984 - Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen watched a TV program called "Talking Turtle," where MIT professor Seymour Papert demonstrated how children could control robot "turtles" using LOGO, a programming language he developed. 1988 - The collaboration between MIT and LEGO resulted in LEGO TC Logo in 1988, which allowed students to control LEGO models using computer commands. The video shows Papert demonstrating TC Logo. 1990 - LEGO TC Logo was hampered since the robots you built had to be tethered to a personal computer. LEGO and MIT

Celebrating MINDSTORMS with a Remix Part 1

In honor of the 25th Anniversary of MINDSTORMS, we asked ROBOTMAK3RS to combine a LEGO set of their choice with a MINDSTORMS set. Here is what these five ROBOTMAK3RS came up with.  MINDSTORMS Chess Assistant by Arvind Seshan Overview: When you are new to chess, it can be a challenge to remember which pieces go where. Now, you can use machine learning and LEGO MINDSTORMS Robot Inventor to build a tool to help you learn where all the chess pieces go on the chess board. Sets used: LEGO® Iconic Chess Set (40174) and MINDSTORMS Robot Inventor (51515) Review: I really like how the chess set base can store all the pieces underneath and that the board neatly splits in half for handy storage. The chess pieces themselves are very sturdy and well built. My only criticism is the building of the box itself. It was quite difficult to see what pieces to use and since the entire box is made mostly of thin plates, it took a lot of time and patience. I would have liked the storage area to be sliding dra